↓ Skip to main content

Social capital and neighborhood mortality rates in Chicago

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
416 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social capital and neighborhood mortality rates in Chicago
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, April 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00177-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly A Lochner, Ichiro Kawachi, Robert T Brennan, Stephen L Buka

Abstract

Several empirical studies have suggested that neighborhood characteristics influence health, with most studies having focused on neighborhood deprivation or aspects of the physical environment, such as services and amenities. However, such physical characteristics are not the only features of neighborhoods that potentially affect health. Neighborhoods also matter because of the nature of their social organization. This study examined social capital as a potential neighborhood characteristic influencing health. Using a cross-sectional study design which linked counts of death for persons 45-64 years by race and sex to neighborhood indicators of social capital and poverty for 342 Chicago neighborhoods in the USA, we tested the ecological association between neighborhood-level social capital and mortality rates, taking advantage of the community survey data collected as part of the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods. We estimated a hierarchical generalized linear model to examine the association of race and sex specific mortality rates to social capital. Overall, neighborhood social capital-as measured by reciprocity, trust, and civic participation-was associated with lower neighborhood death rates, after adjustment for neighborhood material deprivation. Specifically, higher levels of neighborhood social capital were associated with lower neighborhood death rates for total mortality as well as death from heart disease and "other" causes for White men and women and, to a less consistent extent, for Blacks. However, there was no association between social capital and cancer mortality. Although, the findings from this study extend the state-level findings linking social capital to health to the level of neighborhoods, much work remains to be carried out before social capital can be widely applied to improve population health, including establishing standards of measurement, and exploring the potential "downsides" of social capital.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 306 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 20%
Researcher 54 17%
Student > Master 43 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 33 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Other 67 21%
Unknown 36 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 114 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 14%
Psychology 22 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 3%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 63 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2006.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#5,165
of 11,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,160
of 63,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#22
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.