| Title |
Preparation and characterisation of cellulose nanofibres
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-011-5565-x |
| Authors |
E. H. Qua, P. R. Hornsby, H. S. S. Sharma, G. Lyons |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 44 | 21% |
| Engineering | 35 | 16% |
| Materials Science | 30 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 16 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,292,242
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#96
of 4,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,273
of 125,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.