↓ Skip to main content

Nitrogen effects onSpartina foliosa andSalicornia virginica in the salt marsh at Tijuana Estuary, California

Overview of attention for article published in Wetlands, June 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Nitrogen effects onSpartina foliosa andSalicornia virginica in the salt marsh at Tijuana Estuary, California
Published in
Wetlands, June 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf03160808
Authors

Jordan D. Covin, Joy B. Zedler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 9%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 31 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 40%
Environmental Science 12 34%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1992.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Wetlands
#227
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,780
of 13,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wetlands
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them