↓ Skip to main content

A psychodynamic approach to the treatment of pathological gambling: Part I. Achieving abstinence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
A psychodynamic approach to the treatment of pathological gambling: Part I. Achieving abstinence
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02109777
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. Rosenthal, Loreen J. Rugle

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 46%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1999.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#327
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,511
of 22,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them