| Title |
Dynamics of Noise-Induced Cellular Injury and Repair in the Mouse Cochlea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, February 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s101620020028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong Wang, Keiko Hirose, M. Charles Liberman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 20% |
| Researcher | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 34 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 8% |
| Engineering | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,378,253
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#21
of 464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,453
of 50,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 464 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them