↓ Skip to main content

Vessel co‐option is common in human lung metastases and mediates resistance to anti‐angiogenic therapy in preclinical lung metastasis models

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Pathology, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vessel co‐option is common in human lung metastases and mediates resistance to anti‐angiogenic therapy in preclinical lung metastasis models
Published in
The Journal of Pathology, December 2016
DOI 10.1002/path.4845
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria L Bridgeman, Peter B Vermeulen, Shane Foo, Agnes Bilecz, Frances Daley, Eleftherios Kostaras, Mark R Nathan, Elaine Wan, Sophia Frentzas, Thomas Schweiger, Balazs Hegedus, Konrad Hoetzenecker, Ferenc Renyi‐Vamos, Elizabeth A Kuczynski, Naveen S Vasudev, James Larkin, Martin Gore, Harold F Dvorak, Sandor Paku, Robert S Kerbel, Balazs Dome, Andrew R Reynolds

Abstract

Anti-angiogenic therapies have shown limited efficacy in the clinical management of metastatic disease, including lung metastases. Moreover, the mechanisms via which tumours resist anti-angiogenic therapies are poorly understood. Importantly, rather than utilising angiogenesis, some metastases may instead incorporate pre-existing vessels from surrounding tissue (vessel co-option). Since anti-angiogenic therapies were designed to target only new blood vessel growth, vessel co-option has been proposed as a mechanism that could drive resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. However, vessel co-option has not been extensively studied in lung metastases, and its potential to mediate resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in lung metastases is not established. Here we examine the mechanism of tumour vascularisation in 164 human lung metastasis specimens (composed of breast, colorectal and renal cancer lung metastasis cases). We identify four distinct histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of lung metastasis (alveolar, interstitial, perivascular cuffing and pushing) that each vascularise via a different mechanism. In the alveolar HGP, cancer cells invade the alveolar air spaces, which facilitates the co-option of alveolar capillaries. In the interstitial HGP, cancer cells invade into the alveolar walls to co-opt alveolar capillaries. In the perivascular cuffing HGP, cancer cells grow by co-opting larger vessels of the lung. Only in the pushing HGP did the tumours vascularise by angiogenesis. Importantly, vessel co-option occurred with high frequency, being present in over 80% of the cases examined. Moreover, we provide evidence that vessel co-option mediates resistance to the anti-angiogenic drug sunitinib in preclinical lung metastasis models. Assuming that our interpretation of the data is correct, we conclude that vessel co-option in lung metastases occurs through at least three distinct mechanisms, that vessel co-option occurs frequently in lung metastases and that vessel co-option could mediate resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in lung metastases. Novel therapies designed to target both angiogenesis and vessel co-option are therefore warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 22%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Chemistry 5 4%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,550,337
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Pathology
#95
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,366
of 422,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Pathology
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.