↓ Skip to main content

Institutional conditions for diffusion

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Society, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1331 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
832 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Institutional conditions for diffusion
Published in
Theory and Society, August 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00993595
Authors

David Strang, John W. Meyer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 832 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 19 2%
Germany 9 1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 770 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 293 35%
Researcher 89 11%
Student > Master 76 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 73 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 66 8%
Other 160 19%
Unknown 75 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 397 48%
Business, Management and Accounting 223 27%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 20 2%
Arts and Humanities 17 2%
Environmental Science 17 2%
Other 63 8%
Unknown 95 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Society
#218
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,972
of 19,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them