↓ Skip to main content

Learning in social networks and contraceptive choice

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, August 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Learning in social networks and contraceptive choice
Published in
Demography, August 1997
DOI 10.2307/3038290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hans-Peter Kohler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Ireland 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 78 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 25%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 40 46%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2001.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#1,220
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,297
of 29,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.