Title |
Characteristics of users of syringe vending machines in Berlin
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Public Health, July 1994
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf01309220 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Klaus Stark, Astrid Leicht, Reinhold Müller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,497,615
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#149
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301
of 20,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.