↓ Skip to main content

“Freeze, Don’t Move”: How to Arrest a Suspect in Heart Failure – A Review on Available GRK2 Inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Freeze, Don’t Move”: How to Arrest a Suspect in Heart Failure – A Review on Available GRK2 Inhibitors
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2016
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Sorriento, Michele Ciccarelli, Ersilia Cipolletta, Bruno Trimarco, Guido Iaccarino

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease and heart failure (HF) still collect the largest toll of death in western societies and all over the world. A growing number of molecular mechanisms represent possible targets for new therapeutic strategies, which can counteract the metabolic and structural changes observed in the failing heart. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) is one of such targets for which experimental and clinical evidence are established. Indeed, several strategies have been carried out in place to interface with the known GRK2 mechanisms of action in the failing heart. This review deals with results from basic and preclinical studies. It shows different strategies to inhibit GRK2 in HF in vivo (βARK-ct gene therapy, treatment with gallein, and treatment with paroxetine) and in vitro (RNA aptamer, RKIP, and peptide-based inhibitors). These strategies are based either on the inhibition of the catalytic activity of the kinase ("Freeze!") or the prevention of its shuttling within the cell ("Don't Move!"). Here, we review the peculiarity of each strategy with regard to the ability to interact with the multiple tasks of GRK2 and the perspective development of eventual clinical use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2016.
All research outputs
#14,286,049
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,864
of 6,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,753
of 419,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,825 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.