↓ Skip to main content

Our experience with laparoscopic partial gastrectomy by the ‘lift-and-cut method’ for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with maximal preservation of the remnant stomach

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Our experience with laparoscopic partial gastrectomy by the ‘lift-and-cut method’ for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with maximal preservation of the remnant stomach
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00464-016-5367-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shintaro Okumura, Seiichiro Kanaya, Hisahiro Hosogi, Takeshi Ito, Susumu Miura, Toshihiro Okada, Norihiro Shimoike, Shin Akagawa, Hironori Kawada, Akira Arimoto

Abstract

Wedge resection is the most commonly used method in laparoscopic partial gastrectomy for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, this method can involve inadvertent resection of additional gastric tissue and cause gastric deformation. To minimize the volume of resected gastric tissue, we have developed a laparoscopic partial gastrectomy with seromyotomy which we call the 'lift-and-cut method' for gastric GIST. Here, we report a case series of this surgery. First, the seromuscular layer around the tumor is cut. Because the mucosa and submucosa are extensible, the tumor is lifted toward the abdominal cavity. After sufficient lifting, the gastric tissue under the tumor is cut at the submucosal layer with a linear stapler (thus 'lift-and-cut method'). Finally, the defect in the seromuscular layer is closed with a hand-sewn suture. From April 2011 to December 2015, 28 patients underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy by this method at Osaka Red Cross Hospital. Average operation time was 126 min (range 65-302 min) and average blood loss was 10 ml (range 0-200 ml). No intraoperative complications including tumor rupture or postoperative complications regarded as Clavien-Dindo Grade II or higher occurred. All patients took sufficient solid diet at discharge. Median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (range 5-21 days). On median follow-up of 26.6 months (range 6-54 months), no recurrence was reported. Laparoscopic partial gastrectomy by the lift-and-cut method is safe and simple, and widely applicable for gastric GIST.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#18,487,595
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,778
of 6,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,961
of 419,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#100
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,071 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.