| Title |
Effect of a daily dose of Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges in high caries risk schoolchildren
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00784-013-0980-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guglielmo Campus, Fabio Cocco, Giovanna Carta, Maria Grazia Cagetti, Charlotte Simark-Mattson, Laura Strohmenger, Peter Lingström |
| Abstract |
A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed to validate the hypothesis that the use of lozenges containing Lactobacillus brevis CD2 (Inersan®, CD Investments srl) may reduce plaque pH, salivary mutans streptococci (ms) and bleeding on probing, during a 6-week period, in a sample of high caries risk schoolchildren. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 37 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#17,687,671
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#747
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,529
of 192,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.