| Title |
Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Sugarcane Production in Australia: Can These Be Modified for Wet Tropical Conditions Using Seasonal Climate Forecasting?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Springer Science Reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40362-013-0004-9 |
| Authors |
Danielle M. Skocaj, Yvette L. Everingham, Bernard L. Schroeder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 26% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#3,253,535
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Springer Science Reviews
#7
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,804
of 204,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Springer Science Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one scored the same or higher as 10 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them