↓ Skip to main content

Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears

Overview of attention for article published in Obere Extremität, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 166)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Subacromial spacer implantation for massive rotator cuff tears
Published in
Obere Extremität, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11678-016-0386-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malte Holschen, Florian Brand, Jens D. Agneskirchner

Abstract

Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) can be treated arthroscopically by partial reconstruction, tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of the biceps, and debridement. A new treatment option is the additional implantation of a biodegradable spacer (InSpace Balloon®; ISB) into the subacromial space, which reduces subacromial shear forces to keep the humeral head centered in the glenoid. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome of patients with MRCT who were treated arthroscopically with or without an additional ISB. The clinical outcome of patients treated with conventional arthroscopic techniques (n = 11, group A, partial repair, biceps tenotomy, and debridement) and that of patients treated with a supplementary ISB (n = 12, group B) was retrospectively analyzed. Preoperatively and postoperatively, shoulder function was assessed with the Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. At follow-up after a mean of 22 months, patients filled out a questionnaire about their subjective satisfaction. Preoperative shoulder function was lower in patients treated with an ISB (ASES score: group A, 59.1; group B, 31.5; Constant score: group A, 60.7; group B, 36.8). At follow-up, both groups had improved shoulder function (Constant score: group A, 60.7-77.6; p < 0.001; group B, 36.8-69.5; p < 0.001; ASES score: group A, 59.1-88.6; p < 0.001; group B, 31.5-85.7; p < 0.001). Patients in both groups were subjectively satisfied with their outcome. The ISB is a feasible treatment option for MRCT, providing subjective pain relief and improved shoulder function. Further studies with larger patient collectives and longer follow-up are needed to confirm whether it is a safe and cost-effective treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 21%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Master 5 18%
Other 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 68%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,196,781
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Obere Extremität
#5
of 166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,042
of 416,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obere Extremität
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 166 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them