↓ Skip to main content

Stem Cell Therapy for Epidermolysis Bullosa—Does It Work?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stem Cell Therapy for Epidermolysis Bullosa—Does It Work?
Published in
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katsuto Tamai, Jouni Uitto

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa is a group of heritable skin fragility disorders with considerable morbidity and mortality. It is known to be caused by mutations in as many as 18 distinct genes, but there is no specific or effective treatment. Preclinical developments of gene correction, protein replacement, and cell-based approaches for treatment have suggested new therapeutic avenues, and some of them, including bone marrow transplantation and mesenchymal stem cell therapy, have entered into early clinical trials. Hammersen et al. report on two patients with severe generalized junctional epidermolysis bullosa treated with allogeneic stem cell therapy, but with little success. Careful examination of the existing literature suggests that current approaches of cell-based therapies may be helpful in ameliorating some of the clinical features and symptoms in these patients, but advanced strategies, with improved safety profiles, are required for development of durable therapy for these currently intractable disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 24%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#2,967
of 8,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,326
of 317,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#31
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.