↓ Skip to main content

Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
106 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Appearances can be deceiving: instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13423-013-0442-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shana K. Carpenter, Miko M. Wilford, Nate Kornell, Kellie M. Mullaney

Abstract

The present study explored the effects of lecture fluency on students' metacognitive awareness and regulation. Participants watched one of two short videos of an instructor explaining a scientific concept. In the fluent video, the instructor stood upright, maintained eye contact, and spoke fluidly without notes. In the disfluent video, the instructor slumped, looked away, and spoke haltingly with notes. After watching the video, participants in Experiment 1 were asked to predict how much of the content they would later be able to recall, and participants in Experiment 2 were given a text-based script of the video to study. Perceived learning was significantly higher for the fluent instructor than for the disfluent instructor (Experiment 1), although study time was not significantly affected by lecture fluency (Experiment 2). In both experiments, the fluent instructor was rated significantly higher than the disfluent instructor on traditional instructor evaluation questions, such as preparedness and effectiveness. However, in both experiments, lecture fluency did not significantly affect the amount of information learned. Thus, students' perceptions of their own learning and an instructor's effectiveness appear to be based on lecture fluency and not on actual learning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 7%
United Kingdom 6 3%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 170 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Researcher 23 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 10%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 61 31%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 33%
Social Sciences 25 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Computer Science 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 4%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 33 17%