You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characteristics of first-year students in Canadian medical schools.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2002
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irfan A Dhalla, Jeff C Kwong, David L Streiner, Ralph E Baddour, Andrea E Waddell, Ian L Johnson |
| Abstract |
The demographic and socioeconomic profile of medical school classes has implications for where people choose to practise and whether they choose to treat certain disadvantaged groups. We aimed to describe the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of first-year Canadian medical students and compare them with those of the Canadian population to determine whether there are groups that are over- or underrepresented. Furthermore, we wished to test the hypothesis that medical students often come from privileged socioeconomic backgrounds. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 36 | 60% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 30 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 23% |
| Scientists | 13 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 19% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#493,712
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#849
of 9,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260
of 118,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.