↓ Skip to main content

Fruit rot of Strawberry pear (pitaya) caused by Bipolaris cactivora

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Plant Pathology, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 206)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Fruit rot of Strawberry pear (pitaya) caused by Bipolaris cactivora
Published in
Journal of General Plant Pathology, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10327-007-0032-x
Authors

Satoshi Taba, Nao Miyahira, Kanami Nasu, Tetsuya Takushi, Zen-ichi Moromizato

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 46%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Plant Pathology
#32
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,388
of 67,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Plant Pathology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them