Title |
Use of Gene-Activated Demineralized Bone Allograft in the Therapy of Ulnar Pseudarthrosis. Case Report
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioNanoScience, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12668-016-0325-7 |
Authors |
Ruslan Masgutov, Mikhail Chekunov, Margarita Zhuravleva, Galina Masgutova, Oleg Teplov, Ramil Salikhov, Damir Galimov, Yuri Plakseichuk, Albert Rizvanov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 38% |
Other | 2 | 25% |
Professor | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Materials Science | 1 | 13% |
Engineering | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,561,561
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BioNanoScience
#16
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,610
of 325,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioNanoScience
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.