Objective: Women with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or inoperable local recurrence often suffer from a significantly reduced quality of life (QOL) due to local tumor-associated pain, bleeding, exulceration, or malodorous discharge. We aimed to further investigate the benefit of radiotherapy (RT) for symptom relief while weighing the side-effects. Materials and methods: Patients who received symptom-oriented RT for palliative therapy of their LABC or local recurrence in the Department of Radiation Oncology at Heidelberg University Hospital between 2012 and 2021 were recorded. Clinical, pathological, and therapeutic data were collected and the oncological and symptomatic responses as well as therapy-associated toxicities were analyzed. Results: We retrospectively identified 26 consecutive women who received palliative RT with a median total dose of 39 Gy or single dose of 3 Gy in 13 fractions due to (impending) exulceration, pain, local hemorrhage, and/or vascular or plexus compression. With a median follow-up of 6.5 months after initiation of RT, overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 60.0% and 31.7%, and local control was 75.0% and 47.6%, respectively. Radiation had to be discontinued in 4 patients due to oncological clinical deterioration or death. When completed as initially planned, symptom improvement was achieved in 95% and WHO level reduction of analgesics in 28.6% of patients. In 36% (16%) of patients, local RT had already been indicated >3 months (>6 months) before the actual start of RT, but was delayed or not initiated among others in favor of drug alternatives or systemic therapies. RT-associated toxicities included only low-grade side-effects (CTCAE I°-II°) with predominantly skin erythema and fatigue even in the context of re-RT. Conclusion: Palliative RT in symptomatic LABC or locoregional recurrence is an effective treatment option for controlling local symptoms with only mild toxicity. It may thus improve QOL and should be considered early in palliative patient care management.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#10,653,203
of 32,617,562 outputs
Outputs from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
#244
of 1,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,266
of 438,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
#8
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,617,562 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
