↓ Skip to main content

Latitudinal patterns in phenotypic plasticity: the case of seasonal flexibility in lizards’ fat body size

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Latitudinal patterns in phenotypic plasticity: the case of seasonal flexibility in lizards’ fat body size
Published in
Oecologia, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2682-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Álvaro J. Aguilar-Kirigin, Daniel E. Naya

Abstract

Several studies published over the last years suggest that the ability of many species to cope with global change will be closely related to the current amount of plasticity for fitness-related traits. Thus, disentangling general patterns in phenotypic flexibility, which could be then included in models aimed to predict changes in species distribution, represent a central goal in the current ecological agenda. The climatic variability hypothesis (CVH) could be considered a timely and promising hypothesis since it provides an explicit link between climatic and geographic variables and phenotypic plasticity. Specifically, the CVH states that as the range of climatic fluctuation experienced by terrestrial animals increases with latitude, individuals at higher latitudes should present greater levels of phenotypic flexibility. Within this framework, here we evaluate the existence of latitudinal patterns in fat body size flexibility--estimated as the difference between maximum and minimum fat body size values observed throughout a year--for 59 lizard species, comprising the first evaluation of the CVH for a trait, other than thermic or metabolic characters, in ectothermic species. Conventional and phylogenetic analyses indicated a positive relationship between fat body size flexibility and latitude, and also between flexibility and temperature variability indexes. Together with previous findings our results suggest that: (1) latitudinal pattern for fitness-related traits, other than thermal characters, are beginning to emerge; (2) latitude is usually a better predictor of phenotypic plasticity than putative climatic variables; (3) hemispheric differences in climatic variability appears to be correlated with hemispheric differences in phenotypic plasticity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Uruguay 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 65%
Environmental Science 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2013.
All research outputs
#5,415,224
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,083
of 4,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,667
of 193,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.