↓ Skip to main content

Community water fluoridation and caries prevention: a critical review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Oral Investigations, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,599)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
26 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Community water fluoridation and caries prevention: a critical review
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00784-007-0111-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Pizzo, Maria R. Piscopo, Ignazio Pizzo, Giovanna Giuliana

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to critically review the current role of community water fluoridation in preventing dental caries. Original articles and reviews published in English language from January 2001 to June 2006 were selected through MEDLINE database. Other sources were taken from the references of the selected papers. For the past 50 years community water fluoridation has been considered the milestone of caries prevention and as one of the major public health measures of the 20th century. However, it is now accepted that the primary cariostatic action of fluoride occurs after tooth eruption. Moreover, the caries reduction directly attributable to water fluoridation have declined in the last decades as the use of topical fluoride had become more widespread, whereas enamel fluorosis has been reported as an emerging problem in fluoridated areas. Several studies conducted in fluoridated and nonfluoridated communities suggested that this method of delivering fluoride may be unnecessary for caries prevention, particularly in the industrialized countries where the caries level has became low. Although water fluoridation may still be a relevant public health measure in poor and disadvantaged populations, the use of topical fluoride offers an optimal opportunity to prevent caries among people living in both industrialized and developing countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 18%
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 52 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Environmental Science 10 4%
Chemistry 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 56 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,209,208
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#26
of 1,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,265
of 90,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,599 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them