↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the quality of life of health-referred children and adolescents with short stature: development and psychometric testing of the QoLISSY instrument

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the quality of life of health-referred children and adolescents with short stature: development and psychometric testing of the QoLISSY instrument
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monika Bullinger, Julia Quitmann, Mick Power, Michael Herdman, Emmanuelle Mimoun, Kendra DeBusk, Eva Feigerlova, Carolina Lunde, Maria Dellenmark-Blom, Dolores Sanz, Anja Rohenkohl, Andreas Pleil, Hartmut Wollmann, John E Chaplin

Abstract

When evaluating the outcomes of treatment in paediatric endocrinology, the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of the child is to be taken into consideration. Since few self-reported HrQoL instruments exist for children with diagnosed short stature (dSS), the objective of this study was to develop and psychometrically test a targeted HrQoL instrument for use in multinational clinical research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Researcher 15 17%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Psychology 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#914
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,452
of 205,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#10
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.