↓ Skip to main content

Density estimation in tiger populations: combining information for strong inference

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Density estimation in tiger populations: combining information for strong inference
Published in
Ecology, July 2012
DOI 10.1890/11-2110.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arjun M. Gopalaswamy, J. Andrew Royle, Mohan Delampady, James D. Nichols, K. Ullas Karanth, David W. Macdonald

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Brazil 5 2%
India 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 304 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 27%
Student > Master 56 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 17%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Other 24 7%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 31 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 56%
Environmental Science 90 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 <1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 38 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,353,337
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#3,144
of 6,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,892
of 164,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#19
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.