You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
人間ドック全受診者に対する甲状腺超音波健診の結果と,結節性病変の経年的変化
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.11320/ningendock.25.789 |
| Authors |
宮崎 朝子, 志村 浩己, 堀内 里枝子, 岩村 洋子, 志村 浩美, 小林 哲郎, 若林 哲也, 田草川 正弘 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,478,408
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock
#8
of 41 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,256
of 206,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Official Journal of Japan Society of Ningen Dock
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.