↓ Skip to main content

Pitfalls in compound-specific isotope analysis of environmental samples

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Pitfalls in compound-specific isotope analysis of environmental samples
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00216-007-1588-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michaela Blessing, Maik A. Jochmann, Torsten C. Schmidt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Belgium 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 114 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Researcher 25 20%
Student > Master 15 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 8 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 30 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 19%
Chemistry 14 11%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#2,202
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,315
of 84,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.