↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Analysis of Inherited Leukodystrophies: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in the CSF1R Gene

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Neurology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Analysis of Inherited Leukodystrophies: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in the CSF1R Gene
Published in
JAMA Neurology, July 2013
DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rita Guerreiro, Eleanna Kara, Isabelle Le Ber, Jose Bras, Jonathan D. Rohrer, Ricardo Taipa, Tammaryn Lashley, Céline Dupuits, Nicole Gurunlian, Fanny Mochel, Jason D. Warren, Didier Hannequin, Frédéric Sedel, Christel Depienne, Agnès Camuzat, Véronique Golfier, Foucaud Du Boisguéheneuc, Lucia Schottlaender, Nick C. Fox, Jonathan Beck, Simon Mead, Martin N. Rossor, John Hardy, Tamas Revesz, Alexis Brice, Henry Houlden

Abstract

The leukodystrophies comprise a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of progressive hereditary neurological disorders mainly affecting the myelin in the central nervous system. Their onset is variable from childhood to adulthood and presentation can be with a variety of clinical features that include mainly for adult-onset cases cognitive decline, seizures, parkinsonism, muscle weakness, neuropathy, spastic paraplegia, personality/behavioral problems, and dystonia. Recently, Rademakers and colleagues identified mutations in the CSF1R gene as the cause of hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with spheroids (HDLS), offering the possibility for an in-life diagnosis. The detection of mutations in this gene in cases diagnosed with different clinical entities further demonstrated the difficulties in the clinical diagnosis of HDLS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Psychology 9 9%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,847,956
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Neurology
#3,190
of 5,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,452
of 206,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Neurology
#32
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.