↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Evolution in Large Genetic Networks: Does Connectivity Equal Constraint?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Molecular Evolution in Large Genetic Networks: Does Connectivity Equal Constraint?
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00239-003-2544-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew W. Hahn, Gavin C. Conant, Andreas Wagner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 3%
United States 5 3%
Spain 3 2%
Mexico 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 134 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 29%
Researcher 38 23%
Professor 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Master 12 7%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 8 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 17%
Computer Science 9 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 10 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#453
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,904
of 133,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.