| Title |
A Review of Empirical Literature on Inquiry Professional Development: Alignment with Best Practices and a Critique of the Findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Science Teacher Education, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2 |
| Authors |
Daniel K. Capps, Barbara A. Crawford, Mark A. Constas |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 284 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 16% |
| Researcher | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 20% |
| Unknown | 50 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 144 | 48% |
| Arts and Humanities | 25 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science Teacher Education
#63
of 381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,017
of 328,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science Teacher Education
#27
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 381 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.