| Title |
Osteoporosis after spinal cord injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-005-2028-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheng-Dan Jiang, Li-Yang Dai, Lei-Sheng Jiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 24% |
| Unknown | 44 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 29% |
| Engineering | 21 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,724,885
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#783
of 3,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,696
of 58,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.