↓ Skip to main content

Arrow's Theorem and Engineering Design Decision Making

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Engineering Design, December 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 105)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Arrow's Theorem and Engineering Design Decision Making
Published in
Research in Engineering Design, December 1999
DOI 10.1007/s001630050016
Authors

Michael J. Scott, Erik K. Antonsson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 74 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 33%
Student > Master 11 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Professor 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 54%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Design 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2002.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Research in Engineering Design
#15
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,873
of 106,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Engineering Design
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them