| Title |
Dynamics of Andean potato agriculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, January 1981
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02859217 |
| Authors |
Stephen B. Brush, Heath J. Carney, Zósimo Humán |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,879,610
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#107
of 909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#946
of 29,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them