Title |
Tick-borne encephalitis in dogs: neuropathological findings and distribution of antigen
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, March 1998
|
DOI | 10.1007/s004010050811 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
H. Weissenböck, Angelika Suchy, Heidemarie Holzmann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
Researcher | 3 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 15% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 46% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#2,442
of 2,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,613
of 31,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.