↓ Skip to main content

Prehistoric nutrient inputs and productivity in Narragansett Bay

Overview of attention for article published in Estuaries and Coasts, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Prehistoric nutrient inputs and productivity in Narragansett Bay
Published in
Estuaries and Coasts, June 1997
DOI 10.2307/1352341
Authors

Scott W. Nixon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Professor 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2015.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#264
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,289
of 29,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them