↓ Skip to main content

Assessing Diet Quality in a Population of Low-Income Pregnant Women: A Comparison Between Native Americans and Whites

Overview of attention for article published in Maternal and Child Health Journal, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Assessing Diet Quality in a Population of Low-Income Pregnant Women: A Comparison Between Native Americans and Whites
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal, December 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10995-006-0155-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Watts, Helaine Rockett, Heather Baer, Jill Leppert, Graham Colditz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Psychology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#839
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,680
of 161,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.