↓ Skip to main content

Perception of individuality in bat vocal communication: discrimination between, or recognition of, interaction partners?

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Perception of individuality in bat vocal communication: discrimination between, or recognition of, interaction partners?
Published in
Animal Cognition, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10071-013-0628-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanna B. Kastein, Rebecca Winter, A. K. Vinoth Kumar, Sripathi Kandula, Sabine Schmidt

Abstract

Different cognitive processes underlying voice identity perception in humans may have precursors in mammals. A perception of vocal signatures may govern individualised interactions in bats, which comprise species living in complex social structures and are nocturnal, fast-moving mammals. This paper investigates to what extent bats recognise, and discriminate between, individual voices and discusses acoustic features relevant for accomplishing these tasks. In spontaneous presentation and habituation-dishabituation experiments, we investigated how Megaderma lyra perceives and evaluates stimuli consisting of contact call series with individual-specific signatures from either social partners or unknown individuals. Spontaneous presentations of contact call stimuli from social partners or unknown individuals elicited strong, but comparable reactions. In the habituation-dishabituation experiments, bats dishabituated significantly to any new stimulus. However, reactions were less pronounced to a novel stimulus from the bat used for habituation than to stimuli from other bats, irrespective of familiarity, which provides evidence for identity discrimination. A model separately assessing the dissimilarity of stimuli in syllable frequencies, syllable durations and inter-call intervals relative to learned memory templates accounted for the behaviour of the bats. With respect to identity recognition, the spontaneous presentation experiments were not conclusive. However, the habituation-dishabituation experiments suggested that the bats recognised voices of social partners as the reaction to a re-habituation stimulus differed after a dishabituation stimulus from a social partner and an unknown bat.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Hungary 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 90 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 68%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Linguistics 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,262,460
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#300
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,823
of 193,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.