Title |
Life cycle assessment of bread produced on different scales
|
---|---|
Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, January 1999
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02979392 |
Authors |
Karin Andersson, Thomas Ohlsson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 160 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 35 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 19% |
Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 10% |
Unknown | 35 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 42 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 16% |
Engineering | 21 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
Other | 21 | 13% |
Unknown | 43 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,907,210
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#150
of 1,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,846
of 110,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them