↓ Skip to main content

Social media, knowledge translation, and action on the social determinants of health and health equity: A survey of public health practices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Social media, knowledge translation, and action on the social determinants of health and health equity: A survey of public health practices
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, November 2016
DOI 10.1057/s41271-016-0042-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sume Ndumbe-Eyoh, Agnes Mazzucco

Abstract

The growth of social media presents opportunities for public health to increase its influence and impact on the social determinants of health and health equity. The National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health at St. Francis Xavier University conducted a survey during the first half of 2016 to assess how public health used social media for knowledge translation, relationship building, and specific public health roles to advance health equity. Respondents reported that social media had an important role in public health. Uptake of social media, while relatively high for personal use, was less present in professional settings and varied for different platforms. Over 20 per cent of those surveyed used Twitter or Facebook at least weekly for knowledge exchange. A lesser number used social media for specific health equity action. Opportunities to enhance the use of social media in public health persist. Capacity building and organizational policies that support social media use may help achieve this.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 34 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 19%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Computer Science 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,671,766
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#168
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,830
of 416,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.