↓ Skip to main content

Interpreting the effects of mothers' postnatal depression on children's intelligence: A critique and re-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Interpreting the effects of mothers' postnatal depression on children's intelligence: A critique and re-analysis
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, March 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf02251301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dale F. Hay, R. Kumar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 33%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#364
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,498
of 24,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them