Title |
Microbial mediated arsenic biotransformation in wetlands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, December 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11783-017-0893-y |
Authors |
Si-Yu Zhang, Paul N. Williams, Jinming Luo, Yong-Guan Zhu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 16 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,597,517
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
#113
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,544
of 416,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.