↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the central and peripheral effects of cetirizine and terfenadine

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, May 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the central and peripheral effects of cetirizine and terfenadine
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, May 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00558262
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. C. Pechadre, D. Vernay, J. F. Trolese, M. Bloom, P. Dupont, J. P. Rihoux

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#951
of 2,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,735
of 12,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.