| Title |
Diagnostic measures for sarcopenia and bone mineral density
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-013-2376-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Y. Bijlsma, M. C. G. Meskers, M. Molendijk, R. G. J. Westendorp, S. Sipilä, L. Stenroth, E. Sillanpää, J. S. McPhee, D. A. Jones, M. Narici, H. Gapeyeva, M. Pääsuke, E. Seppet, T. Voit, Y. Barnouin, J. Y. Hogrel, G. Butler-Browne, A. B. Maier |
| Abstract |
Currently used diagnostic measures for sarcopenia utilize different measures of muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance. These diagnostic measures associate differently to bone mineral density (BMD), as an example of muscle-related clinical outcome. These differences should be taken into account when studying sarcopenia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Estonia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Professor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 25% |
| Unknown | 24 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 32% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,271,180
of 22,709,015 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,341
of 3,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,693
of 193,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#23
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,709,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.