| Title |
Student suspension: A critical reappraisal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Urban Review, December 1982
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02171974 |
| Authors |
Shi-Chang Wu, William Pink, Robert Crain, Oliver Moles |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 37% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 35 | 54% |
| Psychology | 8 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2017.
All research outputs
#970,671
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Urban Review
#14
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179
of 34,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Urban Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them