↓ Skip to main content

Two types of voluntary undergraduate attrition: Application of Tinto's model

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Higher Education, September 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Two types of voluntary undergraduate attrition: Application of Tinto's model
Published in
Research in Higher Education, September 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf00983501
Authors

Shelly B. Getzlaf, Gordon M. Sedlacek, Kathleen A. Kearney, Jane M. Blackwell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 46%
Psychology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1989.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Research in Higher Education
#389
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,499
of 8,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Higher Education
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them