| Title |
Calcium absorption from a new calcium delivery system (CCM)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Calcified Tissue International, December 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02556676 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth T. Smith, Robert P. Heaney, Lawrence Flora, Sharilyn M. Hinders |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#3,292,595
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#211
of 1,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,758
of 49,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them