| Title |
Dietary calcium and hip fracture risk: The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-Up Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, July 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01623673 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. C. Looker, T. B. Harris, J. H. Madans, C. T. Sempos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2010.
All research outputs
#3,292,595
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#553
of 3,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,139
of 20,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them