| Title |
Vitamin D supplementation in the elderly: Review of safety and effectiveness of different regimes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Calcified Tissue International, June 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00298580 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. M. Byrne, R. Freaney, M. J. McKenna |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 28% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 24% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 52% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#8,135,949
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#581
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,877
of 25,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.