| Title |
Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02600252 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan M. Teno, Rosemarie B. Hakim, William A. Knaus, Neil S. Wenger, Russell S. Phillips, Albert W. Wu, Peter Layde, Alfred F. Connors, Neal V. Dawson, Joanne Lynn, the SUPPORT Investigators |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#5,033,437
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,124
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,373
of 25,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.