↓ Skip to main content

Health-related quality of life in a multiethnic sample of breast cancer survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Health-related quality of life in a multiethnic sample of breast cancer survivors
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, August 2004
DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2801_6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoinette S. Giedzinska, Beth E. Meyerowitz, Patricia A. Ganz, Julia H. Rowland

Abstract

Little is known about the experiences of women from varying ethnic groups following treatment for breast cancer. This study provides a comprehensive description of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and identifies problem areas and predictive factors for a multiethnic sample. Six hundred twenty-one breast cancer survivors from 2 major cities participated within 5 years of their diagnosis. Participants were African Americans, Latinas, Asian Americans, and Whites. Patients filled out questionnaire packets comprising standardized instruments related to HRQL, psychological adjustment, cancer-related treatment, and demographic variables. Data were analysed using 2 methods: (a) observation of findings prior to controlling for demographic and treatment variables and (b) observation of findings after controlling for variables confounded with ethnicity. Findings indicate that most women experienced good HRQL. Group differences revealed that African Americans found more meaning in life as a result of having breast cancer, and Latinas reported more physical symptoms. Age predicted aspects of HRQL for African Americans and Whites. This study comprehensively assessed HRQL following breast cancer for ethnic minority women. Most breast cancer survivors in this study reported levels of HRQL comparable to established norms. However, some quality of life impediments surfaced in particular groups. Researchers should not assume that predictive models of breast cancer HRQL are the same across ethnic groups.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Unspecified 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 10 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 22%
Social Sciences 10 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Unspecified 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#7,495,032
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#689
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,755
of 53,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.