| Title |
Spatial characteristics of landslides triggered by the 2015 Mw 7.8 (Gorkha) and Mw 7.3 (Dolakha) earthquakes in Nepal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landslides, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10346-016-0763-x |
| Authors |
Tapas R. Martha, Priyom Roy, Ritwik Mazumdar, K. Babu Govindharaj, K. Vinod Kumar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 39 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 12% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Energy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,235,599
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#33
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,168
of 319,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.